The T-72 was a product of a rivalry between design teams. Production and development of various modernized T-72 models continues today.ĭevelopment Development from the T-64 The Russian T-90 introduced in 1992 and the Chinese Type 99 are further developments of the T-72. It has been widely exported and has seen service in 40 countries and in numerous conflicts. About 25,000 T-72 tanks have been built, and refurbishment has enabled many to remain in service for decades. The T-72 was a development of the T-64, which was troubled by high costs and its reliance on immature developmental technology. Under normal (major nation) circumstances you are in 95% of all battlefield cases much better served by the tank, both have comparable costs/production times (the destroyer even uses more Tungsten).The T-72 is a family of Soviet main battle tanks that entered production in 1969. I have never seen even the Soviet Union building better than light tank II in 1941/42 in 8 game starts a Germany. Look at the piercing value of the tank destroyer - it is MUCH higher than the one of the tank on which chassis the tank destroyer is built.īut said condition will only apply to minors starting way backwards. Yes, in exactly one situation: The enemy fields tanks a class higher than yours. Originally posted by egp_2401:So I am producing medium tanks to make them my main tank but I saw the tank destroyer variant and researched it, I see that the breaktrhough value(I am talking about the first medium tank for Germany)is MUCH lower and soft attack is also quite lower, I want to use tanks as independent units that do not neccesarly need infantry support, so are tank destroyers worth producing?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |